<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What About Picasa?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rojakstudio.com/news/2007/05/27/what-about-picasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rojakstudio.com/news/2007/05/27/what-about-picasa/</link>
	<description>Rojakstudio... best in Portrait and... and... and...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chester Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.rojakstudio.com/news/2007/05/27/what-about-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Chester Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojakstudio.com/news/2007/05/27/what-about-picasa/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Quote: There are some others who used both Picasa and Photoshop together. Because of Picasa’s fill light control greatly outweigh Photoshop, what they did is that they used Picasa’s advantage, save it and then use Photoshop to fine-tune their picture.

That's exactly my workflow. Cheerios!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: There are some others who used both Picasa and Photoshop together. Because of Picasa’s fill light control greatly outweigh Photoshop, what they did is that they used Picasa’s advantage, save it and then use Photoshop to fine-tune their picture.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly my workflow. Cheerios!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

